Core Banking Migration Guide | Step-by-Step | CoreFi

Legacy core banking systems are expensive, inflexible, and increasingly risky. According to the ECB, over 60% of European banks identify legacy IT as their primary barrier to innovation. McKinsey estimates that banks spend 70-80% of their IT budgets on maintaining existing systems rather than building new capabilities.

Yet despite the urgency, core banking migration remains one of the most complex and high-risk technology programs a financial institution can undertake. Failed migrations have cost banks hundreds of millions, damaged customer relationships, and even threatened institutional viability.

This guide distills the lessons from successful (and unsuccessful) core banking migrations into a practical, step-by-step framework.

Why Migrate? The Case for Change

Before diving into the how, it's worth being clear about the why. Migration is expensive and risky — the business case must be compelling.

Cost reduction: Legacy systems typically cost 3-5x more per transaction than modern cloud-native platforms. Maintenance costs escalate as the talent pool for legacy technologies (COBOL, AS/400) shrinks.

Speed to market: Legacy systems require months to launch new products. Modern platforms enable configuration in days or weeks.

Regulatory compliance: DORA, PSD3, and other regulations are imposing new requirements that legacy systems struggle to meet — operational resilience, real-time reporting, API access.

Competitive pressure: Digital-native competitors are launching products at a pace that legacy institutions cannot match. The gap is widening, not closing.

Risk reduction: Legacy systems represent concentration risk. Single points of failure, limited disaster recovery, and vendor dependency create existential vulnerabilities.

The Three Migration Approaches

1. Big Bang Migration

Replace the entire core banking system in a single cutover event.

Pros: Clean break, no dual running costs, simpler long-term architecture. Cons: Highest risk, longest planning period, massive organizational disruption. Best for: Smaller institutions with limited product complexity.

2. Progressive Migration (Strangler Pattern)

Gradually move functionality from the old system to the new, product by product or capability by capability.

Pros: Lower risk, immediate benefits, organizational learning, reversible. Cons: Longer overall timeline, dual running costs, integration complexity. Best for: Large institutions with complex portfolios.

3. Greenfield + Migration

Launch new products on the new platform while maintaining existing products on the legacy system. Migrate existing portfolios over time.

Pros: Lowest risk, fastest time to new capabilities, natural migration timeline. Cons: Long-term dual running, data fragmentation, customer experience challenges. Best for: Institutions where new product launches are the priority.

Our recommendation: For most institutions, progressive migration offers the best balance of risk and reward. It allows you to prove the new platform with lower-risk products before migrating critical workloads.

Step-by-Step Migration Framework

Phase 1: Assessment & Strategy (8-12 weeks)

1.1 Current State Analysis

• Document all products, accounts, and transactions on the legacy system
• Map all integrations (payments, cards, channels, regulatory reporting)
• Identify customizations and workarounds that have accumulated over the years
• Quantify the true cost of the legacy system (licensing, maintenance, opportunity cost)

1.2 Target State Definition

• Define the target architecture (which platform, which modules, which integrations)
• Identify which products will migrate first and which will migrate later
• Define the data migration strategy (what data moves, what gets archived, what transforms)
• Establish success criteria and rollback triggers

1.3 Risk Assessment

• Identify the top 10 risks and define mitigation strategies for each
• Plan for data integrity — how will you verify that migrated data is complete and accurate?
• Define the testing strategy (unit, integration, performance, UAT, parallel running)
• Establish the governance structure (steering committee, workstreams, escalation paths)

Phase 2: Foundation (12-16 weeks)

2.1 Platform Setup

• Provision the new core banking environment
• Configure base parameters (chart of accounts, currency settings, interest calculation rules)
• Set up the integration framework (API gateway, event bus, message queues)
• Establish CI/CD pipelines for configuration management

2.2 Integration Build

• Build or configure integrations with payment schemes (SEPA, SWIFT, local schemes)
• Connect identity verification and KYC providers
• Set up card processing integration
• Configure channel connectivity (mobile, web, branch, API)
• Build regulatory reporting interfaces

2.3 Data Migration Design

• Design the data mapping between legacy and target schemas
• Build data extraction, transformation, and loading (ETL) pipelines
• Create data validation rules and reconciliation procedures
• Run initial data migration tests with sample datasets

Phase 3: Build & Configure (16-24 weeks)

3.1 Product Configuration

• Configure the first wave of products on the new platform
• Build product-specific business rules and workflows
• Configure fee structures, interest calculations, and limits
• Set up automated testing for each product configuration

3.2 Testing

• Functional testing: Every product feature works correctly
• Integration testing: All integrations process correctly end-to-end
• Performance testing: System handles expected volumes with headroom
• Data migration testing: Full-scale test migration with complete reconciliation
• User acceptance testing: Business users validate real-world scenarios
• Parallel running: Both systems process the same transactions, results compared

3.3 Training

• Train operations teams on the new platform
• Train customer-facing staff on changes to customer journeys
• Train IT teams on platform administration and monitoring
• Create runbooks for common operational procedures

Phase 4: Migration Execution (4-8 weeks per wave)

4.1 Pre-Migration

• Final data extraction and transformation
• Freeze period on the legacy system (no new accounts or products)
• Complete final reconciliation between legacy and target
• Execute go/no-go decision with all stakeholders

4.2 Cutover

• Execute data migration
• Run automated validation checks
• Verify all integrations are processing
• Open channels for customer testing (internal users first)
• Monitor for anomalies in real-time

4.3 Stabilization

• Hypercare period with enhanced monitoring and support
• Rapid response team for any issues
• Daily reconciliation between expected and actual results
• Customer communication for any experience changes
• Document lessons learned for subsequent waves

Phase 5: Optimization (Ongoing)

5.1 Legacy Decommission

• Once all products have migrated, decommission the legacy system
• Archive data per regulatory retention requirements
• Terminate legacy vendor contracts
• Reassign or reskill legacy technology teams

5.2 Value Realization

• Measure actual costs against business case projections
• Launch new products enabled by the new platform
• Implement process improvements and automation
• Build advanced analytics and reporting capabilities

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Underestimating data complexity: Legacy systems accumulate decades of data quirks — missing fields, inconsistent formats, orphaned records. Budget 30-40% more time for data migration than your initial estimate.

Ignoring the people dimension: Technology migration is also a change management program. Staff resistance, skill gaps, and organizational inertia have derailed more migrations than technical issues.

Trying to replicate the legacy system: Don't just rebuild your legacy processes on a new platform. Migration is an opportunity to simplify and improve. Challenge every existing process — if you can't explain why it exists, consider eliminating it.

Insufficient testing: Parallel running is not optional for critical banking systems. Budget for at least 3 months of parallel running with daily reconciliation.

Vendor over-reliance: Your migration partner and platform vendor will be essential, but the institutional knowledge lives within your organization. Don't outsource accountability.

The CoreFi Approach: Modular Migration

CoreFi's modular architecture is specifically designed for progressive migration. Rather than requiring a full-platform commitment, institutions can start with a single module — lending, onboarding, or tokenization — prove the value, and expand from there.

This approach eliminates the "big decision" barrier that prevents many institutions from starting their modernization journey. You don't need to commit to replacing your entire core on day one. Start with the module that delivers the most immediate value, demonstrate ROI, and build organizational confidence for broader migration.

---

Ready to start your migration journey? Book a demo to explore CoreFi's modular migration approach.