Segment
Who the customer is in market terms — bank, digital lender, EMI, asset manager, tokenization issuer, embedded-finance partner — without the brand name.
CoreFi customers run regulated workloads — direct lending books, modernized cores, tokenization and stablecoin programs. Where contractual confidentiality applies, we publish the story anonymized: segment, region, problem, modules used, outcome ranges and the implementation timeline that produced them.
Every CoreFi client outcome is written to the same shape so a buyer can compare a digital-lender deployment to a bank modernization or a tokenization launch on the same axes. Where a customer has not authorized public attribution, segment, region and metric ranges replace names — but the modules, the timeline and the outcome shape are real.
Who the customer is in market terms — bank, digital lender, EMI, asset manager, tokenization issuer, embedded-finance partner — without the brand name.
The jurisdiction the deployment serves. Useful when the regulatory frame (ECSPR, MiCA, PSD2, CRR) changes how the story reads.
The operational or commercial constraint that drove the engagement — typically a capacity, time-to-market, cost or compliance gap the customer could not close internally.
Which parts of the CoreFi platform were deployed: Core Banking Engine, Lending Automation, Customer Onboarding, Headless APIs, AI Workflow Control Plane, White-Label Channels, Asset Tokenization, Stablecoin Infrastructure, Custody, Cross-Border Payments.
Anonymized improvements expressed as ranges or percentage uplifts. Numbers are taken from the customer's own measurement; ranges hide deal-specific identifiers, not the result.
Calendar weeks from kickoff to first production workload, plus the rollout shape (single market, multi-market, dual-core parallel run, full migration).
A regulated financial institution with a non-lending core business — asset management, corporate finance and advisory — needed to operate a growing direct-lending book without diverting resources, hiring a servicing team or building a loan-management stack from scratch. CoreFi ran the platform and the servicing operation; the institution kept the customer relationship.
Regulated financial institution running direct lending as a non-core line; primary business in asset management and corporate finance.
European Union — single-market deployment, EU regulatory perimeter.
Roadmap analysis and platform set-up in weeks; data migration and connector build to existing systems; phased cutover with the customer's team trained on the LaaS console before live traffic.
The institution's loan portfolio kept growing, but the servicing workload that comes with 36–72 month tenors did not match its operating model. Each loan needed payment processing, late-fee handling, transaction reconciliation, accounting entries, borrower communications and audit-quality recordkeeping for the full life of the loan. Building the platform in-house meant a multi-year fintech project; outsourcing piecemeal meant fragmenting the audit trail. Neither matched the strategic priority, which was to keep capital and headcount on the core business.
CoreFi deployed an end-to-end Lending-as-a-Service stack on its Core Banking Engine: origination, underwriting, servicing, payment processing, late-payment management, customer service and reporting — all governed by the same permissioning and audit layer that runs the rest of CoreFi. Connectors integrated the LaaS platform with the institution's existing systems so the loan book lived in one record. CoreFi's servicing team operated day-to-day; the institution kept oversight and approvals through the LaaS console.
Modules used: Core Banking Engine, Lending Automation (Lending-as-a-Service), Customer Onboarding, Headless APIs, White-Label Channels.
Capital and management attention moved back to the institution's primary lines. Lending stopped being an operational tax: cost per serviced loan became predictable, the audit trail consolidated under one platform, and the loan book could grow without proportional growth in headcount. The customer's team kept the strategic decisions — pricing, credit policy, approvals — while CoreFi ran the platform, the workflows and the borrower-facing servicing.
A second story is in preparation: an incumbent bank running CoreFi alongside its legacy core to modernize a single customer journey — onboarding, deposits or lending — without a full migration. Anonymization, modules used and metric ranges will land here once the customer has signed off.
Slot reserved — Story 02
Per-slot fields: Segment · Region · Problem · CoreFi modules used · Outcome (metric ranges) · Implementation timeline. Drops in without page-level redesign.
A third story is in preparation: an issuer using CoreFi's Asset Tokenization, RWA Tokenization and Stablecoin Infrastructure modules to launch tokenized instruments under MiCA-aligned controls. Anonymization, modules used and metric ranges will land here once the customer has signed off.
Slot reserved — Story 03
Per-slot fields: Segment · Region · Problem · CoreFi modules used · Outcome (metric ranges) · Implementation timeline. Drops in without page-level redesign.
We will walk through the modules that fit your segment, the outcome ranges they typically produce, and a realistic implementation timeline for your jurisdiction.